Home Blog Page 67

Compact memory modules may make upgradeable laptops a thing again

0
https://img.global.news.samsung.com/global/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/LPCAMM-Module_PR_main1.jpg
Zoom in / Samsung shared this rendering of CAMM ahead of the release of the CAMM2 standard in September.

Of all the PC-related stuff to come out of CES this year, my favorite wasn't Nvidia's graphics cards or AMD's new Ryzens or Intel's iterative processor updates or any of the oddball PC concept designs or anything to do with the Mad Dash. Push generative AI into everything.

No, of all, my favorite thing This important stamp is the memory module Found by Tom's Hardware. If that sounds a bit strange to you, that's because it uses the Compression Attached Memory Module (CAMM) standard – it sits flat against the board with metal contacts, rather than a fixed stick of RAM that you plug into a slot on your motherboard. The board and the CAMM module can communicate with each other.

CAMM memory has been on my radar for a while since it first made the cut in a few Dell laptops. Misidentified at the time A proprietary type of RAM that gives Dell a reason to charge more for it, Dell has been pushing for standardization of CAMM modules for a few years now, and JEDEC (the organization that handles all current computer memory standards) has been formally finalized. Last month profile.

Seeing a genuine CAMM module with a key sticker, similar to what you'd see on an old memory module from Amazon or Newegg, made me very excited about the future of the standard. I had a similar feeling when I started digging into USB-C, or when I started seeing M.2 modules appear in real computers (CAMM is slightly less of the two). Here's something that solves some real problems with current technology, and has industry backing to actually become a viable alternative.

From upgradeable to solder (and back again?)

SO-DIMM Memory Slots on a Framework Laptop 13. RAM slots are commonplace on laptop motherboards, but now you have to do some work to find laptops that have them.
Zoom in / SO-DIMM Memory Slots on a Framework Laptop 13. RAM slots are commonplace on laptop motherboards, but now you have to do some work to find laptops that have them.

Andrew Cunningham

It was easy to save some money on a new computer by buying a version with less RAM and upgrading it yourself, using third-party RAM sticks for a fraction of what manufacturers charge. But most laptops don't give you that luxury anymore.

Most PC makers and laptop PC buyers made an unspoken bargain in the early to mid-2010s, when the MacBook Air and Ultrabook stopped being special thin-and-light outliers and became the standard template for a mainstream laptop: we'll ignore it. Almost any port or internal component in the interest of creating a thinner, thinner and lighter laptop.

One of the more immediate casualties was the CD/DVD drive, though its demise was already being heralded thanks to cheap USB drives, cloud storage, and streaming music and video services. But as laptops got thinner, Ethernet and other non-USB ports (and, eventually, even traditional USB-A ports), and space for hard drives (not entirely a bad thing, now M.2) became progressively harder to find. SSDs are cheap and plentiful), with room for socketed laptop CPUs and other easily replaceable or upgradeable components. Early Microsoft Surface tablets were some of the worst examples of this era of computer design — thin sandwiches of glass, metal, and glue that were difficult or impossible to open without destroying them entirely.

Another casualty of this change is that memory modules, especially dual in-line memory modules (DIMMs), plug into a socket on the motherboard and can be easily replaced. Most laptops had a pair of SO-DIMM slots that were stacked on top of each other (adding thickness) or side by side (taking up valuable horizontal space that could have been used for a larger battery).

Eventually, these began to go in favor of solder-down memory, saving space and making it easier for manufacturers to build MacBook Air-like models that people wanted to buy, but also added a single point of failure to the motherboard. By setting its maximum memory capacity at startup it reduces its useful life.

Biggest bank-stock rally since 2021 raises bar for earnings

0

(Bloomberg) — Fresh off their best quarter since 2021, bank stocks are set for higher-per-share earnings as Wall Street's most influential executives give investors their latest views on the U.S. economy.

Most Read from Bloomberg

JP Morgan Chase & Co., Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc. and Wells Fargo & Co. Friday kicks off the reporting cycle for corporate America, with US bank stocks surging 23% over the past quarter, beating the broader market.

Bank stocks were under pressure for much of 2023, then starting in late October, building hopes that the Federal Reserve could end its rate hike campaign without triggering a recession. Now the focus is on the timing of policy easing, and investors will examine what this means for lenders in all corners of their business, from the health of their loan portfolios to the outlook for deposit rates.

“Banks aren't as cheap as they've obviously been, but at the same time I don't think people believe that banks' valuations are stretched,” said Richard Ramsden, an analyst at Goldman Sachs Group.

If banks are more bullish than expected around net interest income, loan growth, capital markets and deposit pricing, “all of that should lead to higher earnings and relative underperformance for some banks,” Ramsden said.

The KBW Bank Index fell 1% on Thursday, underperforming the broader market and ending the day unchanged.

Also read: Top US banks eager to ease rate pressure after Fed hikes

On Tuesday, attention turns to earnings at Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs. The day brings the first results from regional lenders, PNC Financial Services Group reports, making it a bellwether for regional lenders.

Big banks are generally expected to report weaker fourth-quarter results amid higher funding costs. Net interest income for the sector is likely to decline, while higher costs and weaker trading revenue could weigh on earnings, Goldman's Ramsden said in a statement. Credit growth is likely to moderate, he said.

The companies are expected to detail charges to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as a result of the regional bank failures that rocked financial markets early last year. Citigroup said Wednesday that it would cost $1.7 billion to replenish the FDIC fund. Meanwhile, Bank of America said it would take a $1.6 billion charge tied to the Libor change.

Turning Tide

The tide turned for bank stocks last quarter as the prospect of Fed interest rate cuts in 2024 eased concerns in areas such as net interest margins.

“Most of the big bank stocks saw a strong year-end rally, fueled by hopes that recession risks have eased enough to not have a major impact on their profits,” said David Bianco, chief investment officer for the Americas at DWS. group. “The risk of big banks taking on big loan-loss provisions or being forced to write bonds is now much lower.”

There are many reasons to be cautious. Inflation is well above the central bank's target, and markets are betting on a more aggressive path of rate cuts than the central bank is signaling. JPMorgan CEO Jamie Dimon said this week that he doubts the central bank's hikes will ultimately succeed in curbing inflation without narrowing gaps in the economy.

Some analysts are advising investors to temper their enthusiasm.

At BMO Capital Markets, James Fotheringham downgraded a handful of US banks and specialty-finance firms behind the rally, warning they were vulnerable to the “coming” credit cycle. Analysts at UBS Group AG, meanwhile, flagged the risk of “wild swings in sentiment.”

“The January earnings season could provide a boost to the sector's recent momentum,” UBS's Erika Najarian wrote in a note this week.

Over the past four weeks, hedge funds have been selling the financial sector, averaging $200 million in weekly outflows, while institutions and retail clients were also net sellers, according to data compiled by Bank of America Corp.

Citigroup Inc. Looking more broadly, financials were the only sector with most analysts' earnings revisions upward last month, according to the data.

Bianco at DWS said it is overweight because of strong profits from big banks including JP Morgan, Bank of America, Citigroup and Wells Fargo. Credit is stable, offsetting a decline in global dealmaking fees, and an increase in initial public offerings has brightened the outlook, he says.

– With the help of Elena Bobina.

Most read from Bloomberg Businessweek

©2024 Bloomberg LP

Fannie Willis faces upheaval in Trump Georgia trial

0

Former President Donald J. Nearly three years after the investigation into Trump and his associates began, Fannie D. Willis faces the biggest test in handling the landmark election interference case.

Ms. Willis, the district attorney for Fulton County, Ga., was accused this week of having an affair with the chief prosecutor she appointed to prosecute Trump, riling Republicans and raising questions about her behavior. and judgment. The attorney, Nathan Wade, has reaped more than $650,000 in legal fees.

While many legal experts suspect the allegations — if true — could derail the case, they could present significant problems for Ms. Willis and create a distraction around the case. The allegations have already created a firestorm for the political right, Mr. Trump and his allies accused him of violating county and state laws. They have even given some Democrats pause.

“If the allegations are true — if it's a big deal — it's troubling,” Rob Pitts, a Democrat who chairs the Fulton County Board of Commissioners, said in an interview this week. “For it to come at this time, and at this stage of this trial, may raise questions.”

Charges filed without supporting documents or named witnesses, Mr. Court filings came Monday from an attorney for Michael Roman, a former Trump campaign staffer charged in the case along with Trump and 13 others.

Mrs. Willis Mr. The filing suggested that relationship was a factor in choosing Wade, who has never led a major criminal case and mostly served as a suburban defense attorney and municipal judge.

Mr. Mr. Willis from his office. The filing alleges that Wade profited from his earnings — taxpayer-funded — by sometimes going on paid vacations with him.

Mr. The day after Wade began his run for district attorney in 2022, she filed for divorce. Lawyers for his wife, Joyceel, told Mrs Willis this week that the divorce proceedings began on Jan. A subpoena was issued for his appearance on 23rd.

While court documents do not contain any evidence of a relationship between the suitors, they do confirm that the two have been seen around Atlanta in a “personal relationship capacity” and say people close to the two have confirmed their relationship.

Mr. Roman's attorney, Ashley Merchant, is seeking to expunge the records filed in Wade's divorce case.

Amid the turmoil, Ms. Willis' office has not denied the allegations and has made little comment beyond saying it would respond in court filings. For several days now, it has left serious unanswered questions about possible consequences and legal ramifications.

University of Georgia law professor Nathan S. “I would be surprised if any charges were dismissed,” said Chapman, who teaches a course on ethics at the Nathan S. Goal by Team Willis.”

While he's not an expert on Georgia laws against public corruption, he said, “I wouldn't be surprised if the conduct violates some of those laws.”

Mr. Roman's filing alleges Ms. Willis violated Fulton County laws. But the passage on kinship applies to family members; The county's definition does not appear to include romantic partners.

Jessica Corbitt, a spokeswoman for the district, said she was not aware of any investigation or complaint filed with the county commission, but such matters are likely the domain of the county's ethics board. The board's secretary did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Mr. Among the charges filed by Roman are Mr. The district administration chairman Mr.

Mr. Trump used the allegations to renew attacks on the Georgia case in a series of social media posts. One of his staunchest supporters in Congress was Representative Marjorie Taylor Green, Republican of Georgia. he asked The state governor and its attorney general on Wednesday Mr. Gov. Brian Kemp has not been generally critical of Ms. Willis's investigation so far.

Ms. Green outlined several state laws that Ms. Willis could potentially violate, including laws on bribery, improper influence of a government official, and conspiracy to defraud the government. It is not immediately clear how some of those laws apply; Bribery law is often aimed at payment given or solicited to public officials.

But Ms. Green and others also pointed out pledge Taken by district attorneys in Georgia, in which they promised to seek only “legal damages.” Mr. If Ms. Willis benefited from the money paid to Wade, “she violated her oath of office and a number of Georgia criminal statutes,” Mr. Ms Green said in a letter to Kemp.

Ms. Merchant's motion, Mr. Wade, Ms. Willis and the entire district attorney's office are seeking dismissal from the case. But some of her key arguments may face an uphill battle. Ms. Merchant said Ms. Willis did not receive proper approval from the district when she hired Mr. Wade. But the Fulton County Attorney, Sue Jo, said this week that Mr. Willis, Mr. He said Wade's hiring did not require County Commission approval.

Ms. Merchant also argued that Mr. Wade was incompetent. Nevertheless, in 2016 Mr. He praised Wade's “strong legal background” on Facebook, supporting him in one of his failed bids to become a Supreme Court justice.

“Nathan has practiced in every area of ​​law that appears before the High Court bench,” he wrote. Another post featured a photo of him posing in a Wade campaign T-shirt.

“Nathan Wade is the most qualified person in that race,” he said Thursday when asked about the positions.

Another challenge for Ms. Willis is the new Georgia Commission, established last year by the state's Republican leaders to oversee local prosecutors. Mrs. Willis strongly opposed its creation.

The commission currently has no authority because of a recent court ruling, but Republican lawmakers are crafting legislation to fix that.

Even before the allegations surfaced this week, a group of conservative lawmakers had indicated They intend to complain to the new commission, which Ms Willis argues has failed to resolve pending cases while spending money “pursuing politically motivated cases”.

Josh McCune, chairman of the Georgia Republican Party, said this week that he expects the new allegations to form the basis of a new complaint and speed up lawmakers' efforts to fix problems preventing the new commission from starting its work.

“I doubt a complaint will be filed,” said Mr. McCune said. “I also expect the Legislature to move with greater speed to address these technologies so the commission can get to work.”

On social media this week, a lawyer and former legislator, Mr. McCune, Mrs. Willis and Mr. Trump has called for all criminal proceedings in the case to be stayed while the charges against Wade are investigated.

Clark D., professor of law and ethics at Georgia State University. Cunningham called the new claims “very serious allegations” and the new commission would be a good place to examine them. He noted that the agency's draft rules give it the power to investigate and discipline prosecutors for “prejudicial conduct in the administration of justice that brings the office into disrepute.”

It's unclear whether any of this will affect the timing of Trump's trial. Ms. Willis has sought an Aug. 5 start date, but Fulton County Superior Court Chief Judge Scott McAfee has yet to set a date. Ms Willis recently predicted that any investigation would not be completed until next year.

His next major step is to file a response to the charges. At that time, Judge McAfee may decide to hold an evidentiary hearing. If there is an investigation, Ms. Merchant can provide witnesses who can help substantiate allegations of an affair. Like all proceedings in the case, such hearing will be telecast live.

A hearing date to unseal Wade's divorce papers is set for Jan. 31 in Cobb County. But some discussion of Roman's filing is likely to come up in a hearing set for Friday in downtown Atlanta.

Boeing sued maker of door plugs over 'quality failures' before Alaska Airlines exploded in mid-air

0

The manufacturer of an Alaska Airlines door plug that disconnected mid-air during a flight was the subject of a class action lawsuit last year alleging “widespread quality failures.”

Boeing is under intense scrutiny after Friday's crash of Alaska Flight 1282. Six minutes after takeoff one of the plane's panels snapped off, leaving a gaping hole that left the passengers absolutely terrified. The packed 737 Max 9 was headed to Ontario, California before returning to its departure point in Portland, Oregon.

Spirit Aero Systems, The th manufacturere Door plug, said Wednesday it supports a National Transportation Safety Board investigation into the flight. “As a company, we are focused on the quality of every piece of aircraft that leaves our facilities,” the company, which is not affiliated with Spirit Airlines, said in the statement.

Court documents reveal that Spirit Aerosystems' investors have long had problems with the quality of its products, particularly after the 737 Max tragedies in October 2018 and March 2019, when two planes went down, killing all on board.

The company is the subject of a federal class action lawsuit filed in New York in May by its investors alleging a history of “consistent” quality failures.

Spirit Aerosystems is a major supplier of components to Boeing, and one of its primary roles is manufacturing most of the fuselages used on Boeing 737 aircraft.

Spirit Aerosystems told NBC News in a statement that it “strongly disagrees” with the assertions made in the lawsuit and will “vigorously defend against the claims.” A Boeing spokeswoman responded that the company had nothing to add to the lawsuit.

Although the suit does not mention door plugs, that part of the aircraft is attached to the fuselages.

Despite investors stressing the importance of the 737 Max program after the plane crashes, Spirit Aerosystems shared promises and statements about its refined processes and safeguards, but concealed from investors that Spirit suffered from widespread and persistent quality failures, the lawsuit said. “

The failures include defects such as the “routine presence of foreign material debris”, fasteners and peeling paint in its products.

The lawsuit alleged that the quality failures were the result of a corporate culture that prioritized short-term financial results over production numbers and quality.

The Spirit Aerosystems' quality failures were so severe and persistent that Boeing placed it on probation for several years, from 2018 to 2021.

The case highlights an ethics complaint disclosed to investors in March 2022 that an employee was told to falsify documents to underreport the number of defects in Spirit Aerosystems products.

The employee's email read, “I have lost faith in the quality system here at Spirit and this is my last cry for help to resolve this issue.”

Improperly drilled holes in the 737 Max off pressure bulkhead, quality failures cited in the suit as the “most significant problem” brought to light in October 2022 by Spirit Aerosystems' product and process verification lead quality auditor, the suit said. That bulkhead is necessary to maintain cabin pressure during flight. Despite the defect being reported, the suit claimed Spirit Aerosystems covered it up.

In August, Boeing disclosed to the media that it had identified “fastener holes that did not meet our specifications in the rear pressure bulkhead on certain 737 aircraft.” Then Spirit Aerosystems “belatedly” confirmed the problem in a news release, the lawsuit said.

Another alleged quality defect is the defective tail fin fittings on certain 737 MAX aircraft.

Boeing informed the media that it became aware of the defect on April 13. The defect was found to be caused by improper installation of fittings by Spirit Aerosystems, the suit contended. After Boeing disclosed it, Spirit Aerosystems “lately confirmed a tail fin mounting defect”.

When those issues came to light, they caused Spirit Aerosystems' stock to plummet, and the plaintiffs suffered “significant losses and damages” due to the company's “false and/or misleading statements and/or material omissions.”

In the Alaska Airlines case, investigators will examine whether a blown door plug was caused by Spirit Aerosystems' manufacturing process or a Boeing assembly line.

Republican debate: Five takeaways as Haley and DeSantis face off

0
  • By Bernd Debussmann Jr
  • BBC News, Des Moines, Iowa

image source, Good pictures

Republican presidential candidates Ron DeSantis and Nikki Haley clashed in a tense debate Wednesday, trading barbs days before the Iowa caucuses.

Donald Trump, the front-runner in the race for the party's 2024 nomination, chose not to run again and held a Fox News town hall at the same time.

Iowa is the first contested state to decide who will run for the Republican Party in the general election, likely against Democratic President Joe Biden in November.

Both Mr DeSantis and Ms Haley, who are far behind Mr Trump in the Iowa polls, hope a strong second-place finish in the state on Monday will breathe new life into their campaigns.

Here's what we learned when they went head-to-head on stage in Des Moines.

1) No candidate withdraws

Things started to get heated when the pair traded insults in their first responses.

Mr DeSantis, 45, opened proceedings by calling his opponent “another mouthy politician who tells you what you want to hear”.

Ms Haley fired back, targeting what she called Mr DeSantis' repeated “lies”.

“You're going to find out about a lot of Ron's lies,” she said.

There have been four previous Republican debates, but this one, hosted by CNN at Drake University, resulted in the most direct attacks and testy exchanges.

Republicans in Iowa seemed to be hoping to kickstart the next phase of the race, landing a knockout blow on both before they choose their preferred presidential candidate on Monday. The theme of the night? Attack, attack attack.

2) They went after Trump's record

While the two candidates battled on stage, the former president held an event with his supporters three miles (5 km) away.

The question of his absence, and his lead in the polls, unsurprisingly soon came up in the debate. Mr DeSantis accused the former president of “running to his issues” and ignoring the needs of American families.

He said Mr Trump had spewed “word vomit” on social media and doubted his ability to get through the legal battles he faces.

Ms Haley, for her part, reiterated that she did not believe Mr Trump was “the right president going forward”.

Both have been more vocal in their criticism of him than in previous debates, targeting his handling of issues ranging from the pandemic to border security and relations with China.

At his own event in Des Moines, Mr Trump took aim at both candidates and spoke of the “overwhelming” support he has in Iowa.

In addition, his campaign sent several emails during the race debate criticizing Ms. Haley and Mr. DeSantis on various issues, including Ms. Haley's “childish” foreign policy positions and China and Mr. DeSantis' “false record on Covid.”

3) They collided with immigration

Border security and immigration came up again and again, a reflection of polls showing top concerns for Republican voters in Iowa and around the U.S.

Mr DeSantis urged the crowd not to “trust” Ms Haley with immigration.

“It's like a fox guarding chickens,” he said, referring to the term “illegal aliens” as “respectable.”

Ms. Haley often struck a more nuanced tone on the issue, addressing the root causes of migration in Central and South America and touting her credentials as a former United Nations ambassador.

He said, however, that undocumented immigrants should be deported to “cut the line.”

4) Ukraine is a flash point

The war in Ukraine proved to be one of the most contentious issues of the night, and both candidates sparred with each other over their positions on the conflict.

Ms Haley initially attacked Mr DeSantis for supporting US funding for Ukraine, then reversed her position.

“No one knows what he believes,” she said.

“I'll tell you why Ukraine should be important. It's a freedom-loving country,” he said, adding that it is a “friend” of the United States and that U.S. support “prevents war.”

In response, Mr DeSantis called for an end to the war and said “people like Nikki Haley are more concerned with Ukraine's border than our southern border”.

The conflicts over Ukraine reflect a wider rift in the Republican Party, which is divided over US foreign policy and continued aid to Ukraine.

5) DeSantis gets more hype, but Haley wins

The 200 or so spectators at the arena in Des Moines were far from cheering, but Mr. DeSantis seemed to get his fair share of applause.

Some of his remarks, including a moment when he described Ms. Haley as having a problem with “ballistic podiatry” (in other words, shooting herself in the foot), provoked a good response in the room.

That's not surprising since Iowa is widely seen as more favorable for him than other states like New Hampshire, where a second Republican race will take place and where Nikki Haley is expected to do well.

Ms Haley had some memorable moments and drew cheers when she described the capital riots on 6 January 2021 as a “terrible day”.

Afterward, his campaign staff and supporters said they saw the event as a galvanizing victory heading into the New Hampshire primary.

“Tonight was a win,” Texas congressman Will Hurd told the BBC. “More people Googled Nikki Haley than Ron DeSantis and Donald Trump combined. Her momentum continues.”

But in a room far from the venue, in his private town hall before a favorable crowd, Mr Trump experienced a strong reaction. His supporters chanted “we love you” throughout the event, and he shook hands for more than 10 minutes.

If Mr. DeSantis and Ms. Haley are to mount a serious challenge to the former president, they will need to alienate some of these Iowans before Monday's crucial caucuses.

Citigroup is at risk of a quarterly loss after revealing the charges

0

Jane Fraser CEO, Citi, speaks at the 2023 Milken Institute Global Conference on May 1, 2023 in Beverly Hills, California.

Mike Blake | Reuters

Citigroup warned investors late Wednesday fee Related to the collapse of the Argentine peso and the bank's restructuring comes more than what the company's CFO revealed a few weeks ago.

Its fourth-quarter results are scheduled to be released Friday morning, the bank said had an impact An $880 million foreign exchange loss from the peso and $780 million in restructuring charges were linked to CEO Jane Fraser's corporate simplification plan.

Trump not allowed to give closing arguments in NY civil trial

0

NEW YORK (AP) — Donald Trump won't make his own closing argument in New York Civil commercial fraud investigation After his lawyers objected to the judge's insistence that the former president stick to “relevant” matters.

Judge Arthur Engoren The permit was revoked on Wednesday, a day before closing arguments at the hearing.

The investigation will cost Trump Hundreds of millions of dollars in fines and remove his ability to do business in New York. His lawyers signaled last week that he planned to take the unusual step of Giving a sum in personIn addition to the arguments of his legal team.

Trump is the defendant in the suit filed by New York Attorney General Letitia James. He claims his net worth was boosted by billions of dollars in financial statements that helped secure business loans and insurance.

The former president and current Republican 2024 front-runner denies any wrongdoing and has slammed the case as a “hoax” and a political attack on him. James and Judge were Democrats.

It is very unusual for those with lawyers to present their own closing arguments. In An email exchange It happened in recent days and was filed in court on Wednesday, with Engoron initially approving the unusual request, saying it “included allowing everyone to have their say.”

But he said Trump should limit his comments to the scope of the lawyers' closing arguments: “a commentary on the relevant, material facts in the evidence and an application of the law relevant to those facts.”

He will not be allowed to introduce new evidence, “comment on irrelevant matters” or “deliver a campaign speech” — or impeach the judge, his staff, the attorney general, his lawyers or the court system, the judge wrote.

Trump lawyer Christopher Kiss responded that the limits were “fraught with ambiguities, creating substantial opportunity for misinterpretation or unintended violation. Engoron said they were “reasonable, normal limits,” but Kiss called them “grossly unreasonable.”

“You cannot allow President Trump, who has been wrongfully discredited and discredited by an out-of-control, politically motivated attorney general, to talk about the things that need to be talked about,” the lawyer wrote.

Having not heard from Trump's lawyers as of midday Wednesday, Engoron wrote that he assumed Trump did not agree to the ground rules and therefore would not speak.

Taking on a role usually performed by a lawyer can be dangerous for any defendant. But Trump's willingness to address the court was even more dangerous because he had already misled the judge about prior comments about the case.

Engron imposed a limit Cock order, after Trump posted a disparaging social media post about the judge's law clerk on the second day of the hearing in October, barred all trial participants from commenting on court staff. The post contained a mischievous innuendo about the clerk's personal life.

The judge then imposed fines totaling $15,000, citing Trump's repeated violations of the order. Trump's defense team has appealed.

During a recent email exchange about Trump's possible collusion, Engoron warned Trump's lawyers that if the former president violated the gag order, he would be removed from the courtroom and fined at least $50,000.

Trump testified He defended himself and his real estate empire in a verbal spat with the judge and prosecutors at the November hearing. He considered but skipped a second round of testimony during part of the trial when his own attorneys called witnesses. After teasing the returning look, he changed course and said, “No more to say.”

US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin kept the cancer diagnosis out of the White House

0
  • Kayla Epstein in New York and Bernd Debusman Jr. at the White House
  • BBC News

video title,

WATCH: Pentagon admits delay in discussing Austin status

President Joe Biden was only informed on Tuesday that US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin was being treated for cancer, the White House said.

Mr Austin, 70, was admitted to hospital on January 1 and later admitted to intensive care in December for complications following surgery.

He faced criticism for not telling the higher authorities about this for several days.

He apologized for “not ensuring that the public was properly informed”.

The delay in notifying the White House raised potential national security concerns and issues of transparency within the Biden administration.

The Secretary of Defense sits just below the President in the chain of command for the U.S. military, and is one of the most important members of the President's Cabinet.

The Pentagon confirmed Mr Austin was in hospital on Tuesday.

'not optimal'

At a press conference Tuesday, National Security Council spokesman John Kirby said President Biden was only informed that day of the prostate cancer diagnosis.

“No one in the White House knew until this morning that Secretary Austin had prostate cancer,” he said.

Although he insisted the president's initial reaction was concern for the secretary's health, Mr Kirby admitted communications were “not optimal”.

“It's not the way to go,” Mr Kirby said.

According to Mr Kirby, Mr Biden and Chech Austin have not spoken since their last conversation over the weekend.

image source, Good pictures

image caption,

The Pentagon previously did not say why Lloyd Austin was in the hospital

Although Mr Austin's partner, Kathleen Hicks, was asked to take on some of his responsibilities, she was not informed of his hospital stay.

Doctors for Mr Austin said an examination in December 2023 “identified prostate cancer requiring treatment”.

Mr Austin underwent “minimally invasive surgery” at Walter Reed National Army Medical Center, the country's top military hospital, to remove the cancer on December 22. He was under general anesthesia for the procedure.

He returned to hospital on 1 January 2024 after experiencing “complications” and an evaluation revealed a urinary tract infection. He was transferred to the intensive care unit the next day for further treatment, including “abdominal fluid collection that was impairing the function of his small intestine.”

Doctors said he “did not lose consciousness and was not under general anesthesia” during his stay at the hospital. Mr Austin's infection cleared and “he continues to make progress and we expect a full recovery although it will be a slow process”.

Doctors said the cancer was caught early and his “prognosis is excellent”.

A spokesman for Mr Austin did not provide an update on when he would be discharged, but said “Secretary Austin continues to recover and is in good spirits”.

At Tuesday's briefing, Pentagon press secretary Air Force Maj. Gen. Pat Ryder did not offer an explanation for why Mr. Austin had not released his position sooner.

“I don't have that in particular,” he said, but noted that a prostate cancer diagnosis is “deeply personal.” The Pentagon attributed the failure to a key employee who had the flu.

Mr Ryder said: “Hospital stay notification procedures have been reviewed to ensure we do better next time.”

White House Chief of Staff Jeff Giants on Tuesday ordered members of the president's cabinet to be notified when they are unable to perform their duties.

737 Boeing Revises Guidance, Delays Maximum Inspections

0

Federal regulators on Tuesday said they would review procedures for how Boeing inspects its 737 Max 9 after a panel exploded during a flight last weekend, delaying the manufacturer's efforts to get the jet back into the air.

The Federal Aviation Administration said the agency would change the guidelines it released Monday based on feedback, but the agency did not provide additional details. Instructions on how to comply with FAA rules are often prepared and distributed by aircraft manufacturers, with input from airlines and federal agencies to ensure technicians follow them regularly.

“Upon receipt of Boeing's revised instructions, the FAA will conduct a thorough review,” the FAA said in a statement. “The safety of the flying public, not speed, will determine the timeline for the return of the Boeing 737-9 MAX to service.”

The announcement comes after two airlines reported finding loose parts in the cockpit area under inspection.

On Saturday, the FAA said it would inspect the planes after one such group exploded during an Alaska Airlines flight from Portland the previous day. Although no serious injuries were reported, the incident exposed passengers to powerful winds and raised new concerns about Boeing's quality control practices. The incident has forced airlines operating the Max 9 to cancel a large number of flights.

The explosion is the latest in a series of setbacks for Boeing, which has struggled to restore public confidence after two crashes involving the Boeing 737 Max 8 in 2018 and 2019 killed 346 people.

It was not immediately clear how Boeing's initial plan failed. The company said Monday morning that it had shared instructions with airlines on how to inspect the affected panel, also known as the door plug, which covers where the exit door is installed. Hours later, the FAA said it had “approved a method to comply” with the agency's Saturday order, appearing to confirm Boeing's statement. Tests focus on door inserts, door components and fasteners.

After those announcements, the Max 9's two largest operators, Alaska Airlines and United, said they found loose parts during the crew's preliminary inspections.

Investigators with the National Transportation Safety Board said Monday they have recovered a door plug from an Alaska Airlines plane, but they are still searching for some related parts.

Boeing's chief executive, Dave Calhoun, addressed employees at a meeting Tuesday afternoon, promising transparency in the company's response.

“We're going to approach this — No. 1 — admitting our mistake,” he said, speaking from a Seattle-area factory that makes airplanes, including the Max, according to parts provided by Boeing. “We're going to approach it 100 percent and with full transparency.”

Mr. Calhoun said the agency will work closely with federal investigators. He said he was shocked when he first saw the photo of the incident. A teenage boy and his mother, neither of whom sustained major injuries, were sitting near the blasted panel.

“I have children, I have grandchildren, and so do you,” he said. “This stuff is important. Every detail is important.”

During Friday's flight, 171 passengers and six crew members, pilots and flight attendants struggled to communicate with each other after the group exploded. Crew members were surprised when the door separating the cockpit from the passenger compartment opened, Safety Board Chairwoman Jennifer Homandy said during a press conference Monday night. This exposed pilots to strong winds and cabin noise, making it difficult for them to hear each other and communicate with air traffic control.

Ms Homendi said the cockpit door was designed to open during a rapid decompression event, but the crew had not been made aware of that aspect of the aircraft. Boeing plans to make changes to its handbook to inform employees, he said.

The Alaskan plane was at 16,000 feet when the panel exploded, but had it been at a higher altitude the incident would have been more catastrophic. If the plane had traveled above 30,000 feet, the passengers could have moved around the cabin and had less time to strap themselves in and safely put on their oxygen masks.

As a first step, Boeing will work closely with Boeing to develop a process to ensure all door plugs on 737 Max 9 jets are properly secured, former FAA Acting Administrator Billy Nolan said in an interview.

As a result, airlines must have detailed instructions telling them how to properly inspect the doors, complete with diagrams of the pins and bolts that attach the door inserts to the aircraft. The agency said the order will be reviewed and approved by the FAA.

Mr., who previously headed the FAA's Office of Aviation Safety. Nolan said after Friday's crew explosion, some airlines began preliminary investigations while Boeing was approved by regulators for formal instructions.

“My understanding is that they need the detailed criteria provided by Boeing, approved by the FAA,” he said. “They have to review it and sign off.”

Do you work in aviation? The New York Times wants to hear your story. Share your experiences with us below and you may learn more Here is our report. We particularly want to hear from people who work at airports or airlines, or who are part of government agencies that help keep the aviation industry running. We will not publish any part of your submission without your permission.

Gabriel Attal: France's 34-year-old Macron's prime minister-elect

0
  • By Hugh Schofield
  • BBC News, Paris

image caption,

Gabriel Attal was sworn in on Tuesday following Elizabeth Bourne during an official ceremony at the Prime Minister's residence.

Gabriel Atal has been named France's next prime minister as Emmanuel Macron aims to renew his presidency with a new government.

At 34, he is the youngest prime minister in modern French history, surpassing socialist Laurent Fabius, who was 37 when he was appointed by François Mitterrand in 1984.

Mr Attal replaces Elizabeth Bourne, who resigned after 20 months in the role.

Throughout that time he struggled with the lack of a majority in Parliament.

Gabriel Attal, who is currently the education minister, certainly makes an interesting appointment.

He will now be tasked with leading the French government to crucial European Parliament elections in June.

His rise was rapid. Ten years ago he was an obscure adviser in the Ministry of Health and a card-carrying member of the Socialists.

He was the first gay man of the Hotel Matignon. She has a civil partnership with another Macron whiz-kid, MEP Stéphane Sejournay.

Welcoming him to his new role, President Macron wrote on social media: “I know I can count on your energy and your commitment to implement the revitalization and regeneration program I announced.”

image source, Ludovic Marin/AFP/Pool

image caption,

Gabriel Attal (L) is tasked with leading the government in June's European Parliament elections

“France never rhymes with decline, France rhymes with change, France rhymes with bravery,” Mr Attal declared outside his new home.

But given the difficulties of the president's second term and a growing challenge from the nationalist right – is “eyeballing” the only thing going to cut it?

Handsome, young, charming, popular, talented, Mr. Attal is sure to grace the office.

But like many wealthy people of his generation, he was drawn to Emmanuel Macron's idea of ​​breaking down the old left-right divide and rewriting the codes of French politics.

After Macron's 2017 election, Mr Attal became a member of parliament, where his acumen as a debater – easily bested by the neophyte Macronite – brought him to the president's attention.

At the age of 29, he became the youngest minister in the Fifth Republic with a junior position in education; Since 2020 he has been the government spokesman and his face has begun to register with voters; After President Macron's re-election, he was briefly budget minister, then took charge of education last July.

He acted with a foolish determination to end the September row over Muslim abaya dresses by banning them from schools.

He led a campaign against bullying — himself a victim, he says — at the elite École alsacienne in Paris, and took on the academy with his proposal to experiment with school uniforms.

image source, Jacques Demorton/AFP

image caption,

President Macron's party faces a strong challenge from the National Rally and its young leader Jordan Bartella and Marine Le Pen.

And, all the while, he was actually able to change normal trends by becoming popular with the public.

Polls show she is the most admired member of Macron's government – competing on the same level as the president's main rival, nationalist Marine Le Pen, and her youthful colleague Jordan Bartella.

And there, of course, is its heart.

By drawing Gabriel Attal from his portfolio of ministers, Mr Macron is using an ace to outwit the Queen and her jack. But does it work?

The process of naming him — everyone knew a reshuffle was coming, but it would take forever — showed that if President Macron was well aware of the fragility of his current position, he was deeply uncertain about how to address it.

image caption,

Mr Attal replaces Elizabeth Bourne, but faces the same problems as he did without a majority in the National Assembly

More than one commentator has made it clear that what the public wants above all now is not a reshuffle of the faces at the top, but a renewed sense of purpose for the Macron presidency.

But as things stand, Mr Attel will face the same problems as his long-time predecessor, Elizabeth Bourne.

These are: a hard-right opposition, growing in popularity and poised to easily win the June European elections; The National Assembly, which lacks a built-in majority for the government, makes every new law a struggle; And a president who can't define what he wants to achieve in his second term.

On top of that, the new prime minister will have a problem of his own – establishing his authority over heavyweights like Gerald Dorman and Bruno Le Maire.

Some also ask what the plan is if Mr Macron's party loses a landslide in the European elections.

Usually this would be the occasion for a prime ministerial change, to provide a new élan in the second half of the mandate. But as things stand, that card has already been played, and Gabriel Atal risks becoming a discredited loser if he loses in June.

Even opposition figures recognize that he is a class act. He is respected and liked in the National Assembly.

But there are also questions about what he really stands for. What many doubt is that he is as smiley and wordy as the man to whom he owes his life.

As a presidential candidate, he is a wunderkind's wunderkind. But if he's just Macron's mini-me, the miracle could prove an illusion.